Curry's stunning analysis of this case brings to life our Constitution's fundamental values. A tour de force. -- Roger LevesqueForces us to consider how society can truly guarantee that children will be nurtured in their homes and thrive in safety. -- Thomas L. BirchA gripping story of the real people and events behind the case, interwoven with another story--that of the child welfare system and its related laws and policies--with each story illuminating the other. -- Elizabeth BartholetPoor Joshua! lamented Justice Harry Blackmun in his famous dissent. Victim of repeated attacks by an irresponsible, bullying, obviously cowardly, and intemperate father, and abandoned by respondents who placed him in a dangerous predicament and who knew or learned what was going on, and yet did essentially nothing.... Even so, the Supreme Court, by a 6-to-3 margin, absolved Wisconsin officials of any negligence in a case that had left a young child profoundly damaged for the rest of his life. Does the Constitution protect children from violent parents? As Lynne Curry shows, that was the central question at issue when Melody DeShaney initially sued Wisconsin for failing to protect her battered son Joshua from her estranged husband, thus violating her son's constitutional right to due process. The resulting case, DeShaney v. Winnebago County (1989), was a highly emotional one pitting the family against the state and challenging our views on domestic relations, child abuse, and the responsibilities--and limits--of state action regarding the private lives of citizens. The Supreme Court's controversial decision ruled that the Constitution was intended to limit state action rather than oblige the state to interfere in private affairs. It viewed the Due Process Clause as a limitation on the state's power to act, not a guarantee of safety and security, not even for children who depend on the state for their survival. In this first book-length analysis of the case, Curry helps reade